|
|
|
The Spectacle of the Real:
|
|
It was called The World Trade Centre! Now it belongs to nobody but a group of rich Saudi snot-nosed punks. The only thing they did to us was steal a beautiful image. The only way we get it back is to reflect on it, write on it, say Godbless, Godbless, Godbless until there is more good than bad coming from the whole sorry thing.
|
Even the very phrase September 11 contains cliches formed in crystalline, recursive matrixes that still seem too complex to decode. In the wake of the original events, the ongoing political fallout literally radioactive and the seemingly endless critical feeding frenzy, a certain phraseological fatigue sets in for the researcher picking through the ranks of titles on spectacular culture. While criticality is the first and most obvious kind of intellectual violence, it is theoretical work concerning real events that possesses some of the greatest tendencies for abuse. It was with heavy-heartedness that I began to read this collection of essays by Geoff King, which also clearly had a high likelihood of mentioning The Matrix films (Andy & Larry Wachowski, 1999 & 2003) at some juncture.
The first section of The Spectacle of the Real: From Hollywood to Reality TV and Beyond entitled Spectacle, Ideology, Catastrophe, were it to exist without the following sections, would be one of the first works on September 11 which possesses the dense intelligence required to critically analyse contemporary spectacular culture yet utterly avoid the critical violence of an intellectual ownership. It is rare for critical collections to possess compatible critical terminology, instinct and argument across the different writers' topic and styles, but here there is a real sense of continuity that greatly enhances the argumentative impact. After a short preface by Jay David Bolter, Geoff King's introduction and his own essay are accompanied by media and cinema theorists Douglas Kellner, Lee Rodney, Kathy Smith and Dean Lockwood. The themes of verisimilitude and conceptual breach are deftly pursued from a range of perspectives, and these writers manage to perform a convincing theoretical circumnavigation of the event itself. In the first essay, Douglas Kellner's now-familiar strict style does well to elucidate on aspects of Debord that remain under-realised, and although it is clearly built on his earlier work, his essay becomes possessed with an energetic, manifestive quality, proposing nothing short of a critical theory of globalization. With any kind of semiotic repetition comes accidental permutation, and by the conclusion of the second essay, Lee Rodney's excellent approach to iek and Warhol's film Empire (1964), you gain a sense that the differing approaches to the key terminological touchstones real, the Real, actuality, spectacle, and so on will become as much part of the reading experience as the ideas themselves. The breaking news event is painted as the event that broke the news, leaking as much hysteria and anxiety over the status of the facts as the horror of planes, bodies, buildings.
* * *
(Reprinted from a private journal entry, September 22, 2001)
I changed the channel, from one to another to another, seeing the Twin Towers on multiple screens, confirming the realness of the event in a circular gesture of circling through the stations, and around the differing viewpoints of the towers. The performers in the centre and the crowd in an ordered circle. Clusters form. The magician always passed his own hoop through the trick to confirm its actuality.
Even the internet, the theme is always that of a circle. Nothing escapes the gravity of a well-linked image. The content of the circle becomes immediately absent once seen.
* * *
King's essay, 'Just Like a Movie'?: 9/11 and Hollywood Spectacle, positions particular iterations of the September 11 footage in context of both historical disaster footage and key scenes in spectacular disaster films. Avoiding the much-quoted compulsion to repeat, Kathy Smith's essay furnishes a number of key passages from Metz and engages in a degree of psychoanalytic work to pursue the compulsive nature of spectacle. Dean Lockwood's Teratology of the Spectacle arrives with an almost kinetic force, poetically describing the haunted nature of such images, using Benjamin, Marx, iek and even Douglas Rushkoff to pursue the concept of media's viral legitimacy.
|
Leon Hunt's essay, Hell in a Cell and Other Stories: Violence, Endangerment and Authenticity in Professional Wrestling, is one of the most keenly developed essays on wrestling, encapsulating the dizzying gyre of realities that circulate around the bizarre carnivalesque realm of the continually pseudo-actual. In a textual analysis of one of the sport's (and consequently, television's) most complex moments, all of the genre/sport/system's textual possibilities play out and are thoroughly developed. Docobricolage in the Age of Simulation, by Bernadette Flynn, ends the section on television with a delicately balanced comparative movement through the Big Brother television phenomenon and The Sims computer games, focusing on observation and simulation.
The final section focuses on film, and features essays by Michele Pierson, Lisa Purse, Paul Ward, Julian Petley, Peg Aloi, Mike Wayne, Michele Aaron and Tanya Krzywinska. Michele Pierson's essay literalises the issues set out in the volume by identifying key conceptual framings for production design in films, importantly pegging authenticity as a practice. Lisa Purse's approach to bullet-time special effects encapsulates the visual flaunt of temporal play in action cinema. Paul Ward deploys a vivid analysis of the reals of animated films, specifically the dream-conscious Waking Life (Richard Linklater, 2001) and its moments of uncanny approaches to the actual. In Cannibal Holocaust and the Pornography of Death, Julian Petley takes the aura of snuff head-on with generous research and an inspired path through the issues of the verisimilitude of screen murder. Fittingly, Peg Aloi's essay on The Blair Witch Project (Daniel Myrick & Eduardo Sánchez, 1999) follows Petley's, somehow resulting in a fascinating contrast the almost-real of the former to the actually-fake of the latter giving a sense of deep ambiguity at the heart of such haunted images and sounds that detaches them from narrative contexts and gives them spectral significance. An essay by Mike Wayne that utilises Marxist approaches to analyse the filmic worlds of specters and ghosts, is useful for decoding the commodity of the spectacle. The problematic issues of looking-at-looking come to the fore in Michele Aaron's approach to the self-reflexive cinematic position, specifically where breaches occur in the image-production continuum.
Ending the volume, Tanya Krzywinska's The Enigma of the Real: The Qualifications for Real Sex in Contemporary Art Cinema is an intellectually dense and deeply engaging examination of how sexual depiction comes to be so problematic for audiences and censors, and how circuitous the routes to filmic reading can be. Coming as it does at the end of a collection of accomplished essays, Krzywinska's argument condenses a still-contentious issue into paradoxically unreal and actual sex scenes in specific texts, with the terminology now thoroughly and happily muddied.
Alongside Geoff King, a handful of the contributors come from Brunel University's Film and Television Studies, and although King states that no particular thread has been pursued by the authors, the reader will probably find one regardless, likely pointing to discussions in Brunel's hallways. The conflation of September 11, reality television and film is convincing precisely because the reader is left to pursue the relationships. While the volume is modest in presentation, it possesses some standout essays of original conceit and critical energy. To which a cynic opening its pages can only say Godbless, Godbless, Godbless.
| Click here to order this book directly from |
|
contents great directors cteq annotations top tens about us links archive search